Comment on Irrational
Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 year agoAnd that they might still move continuously. Which is inaccurate (see Planck length).
Comment on Irrational
Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 year agoAnd that they might still move continuously. Which is inaccurate (see Planck length).
wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
That’s not what Planck length is. It’s the minimum resolvable accuracy not measurement. Meaning we can prove something was somewhere specific beyond the Planck length. Not that it’s the building size of the universe.
Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That is actually good to know, it answers a lot of questions I’ve had about the universe.