Comment on Problem solved ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯

• MacNCheezus@lemmy.today ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I don’t see why it would have to be though. A bunch of oddballs could certainly get together and create one to protect diversity in their neighborhood from a normie invasion.

  source

  • DannyMac@lemm.ee [bot] ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The most well-intentioned HOAs can easily go to shit when power-tripping assholes, with all the free time in the world, take them over.

    source

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The reverse is true as well, take over your HOA if you’re so angry at it

      source

      • DannyMac@lemm.ee [bot] ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Thankfully that will never be a problem I’ll have to worry about

        source
    • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      If structured through direct consensus democracy, rather than the appointment of leaders, the Karen’s will be powerless.

      source
  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    For the same reason why very few companies are worker owned co-ops: people suck and capitalism doubly so. That’s why we very rarely can have nice things.

    In the case of HOAs, the bad ones (which are the vast majority of them) exist to extract profit (in the form of increasing property values, fining anyone who doesn’t follow their petty rules, and sometimes even take someone’s home for breaking the aforementioned rules) and exert as much control over people as possible.

    In the US at least, laws regarding HOAs are a grotesque combination of under-regulation and regulations specifically crafted to FACILITATE abuse rather than discourage it.

    source

    • MacNCheezus@lemmy.today ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Perhaps, but as long as there is no law that says you can’t have an HOA that fines you for having a McMansion with a monoculture lawn instead of a natural one, it’s at least possible in theory.

      source