Comment on How are Book Bans Constitutional?

• Nibodhika@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Because they point out facts? Or do you really think there is an unrestricted right?

  source

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    That is what the idea of human rights liberals profess to believe in necessitates, yes.

    What those rights are, exactly, might be debatable, such as the difference between freedom of religion and freedom from religion, but you do believe in human rights, don’t you?

    source

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      Can you give a concrete example so we can understand?

      source

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

        A concrete example of what?

        source
    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      Of course I believe in human rights, but I also think there are limits to it. And you didn’t answer my question, what right do you believe should be unrestricted?

      source

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

        Freedom from religion. The right to clean food and water. The right to self defense. The right to attempt escape from imprisonment. The right to a fair trial. The right to life, liberty, and security of person. The right of the abolition of slavery in all forms.

        Feel free to argue that last one, btw, liberals love to carve out exceptions to it.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  but you trust those who say you should have no rights?

  source

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Interesting assumption.

    source