You’d have to use a very strange definition of edible. For something to be edible it does not only need to be able to fit down your throat, it has to be capable of nourishing you without harming you. You can swallow paper and it won’t harm you, but it also can’t nourish you and is thus inedible. You can eat this mushroom and it’ll probably provide some kind of nourishment, but then it will swiftly kill you and thus it is inedible.
Comment on Mushroom ID
lol_idk@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Technically it’s still edible
booty@hexbear.net 10 months ago
Erika3sis@hexbear.net 10 months ago
Jimmy Neutron “sodium chloride” ass reply, “everything is edible at least once” is a common joke that works precisely because words’ definitions are not rigid
booty@hexbear.net 10 months ago
Yeah, it’s a very common joke which I argue does not work because despite the fact that there is leeway in how words are defined (that’s kind of what my entire comment is about) there is no valid definition of edible which includes mushrooms that definitely kill you if you eat them.
Erika3sis@hexbear.net 10 months ago
Whatever you say, Bazinga Neutron
Owl@hexbear.net 10 months ago
A bollard isn’t edible, even once.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 months ago
Only once. ;)
anonochronomus@hexbear.net 10 months ago
You can do anything once.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 months ago
Don’t tempt me with a good time.
qyron@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
Once.
peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
They said you die one or two days after eating. You could definitely eat more than once in that time.
Scolding7300@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Then you would reset the count, so as ling as you don’t stop eating it you can eat an infinite amount
MBM@lemmings.world 10 months ago
If you eat fast enough, maybe twice!