Nobody would read it even after it was published. No scientist have time to read other’s papers. They’re too busy writing their own papers. This mistake probably made it more read than 99% of all other scientific papers.
Comment on Name & same. :)
Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca 1 month agoWhat, nobody read it before it was published? Whenever I’ve tried to publish anything it gets picked over with a fine toothed comb. But somehow they missed an entire paragraph of the AI equivalent of that joke from parks and rec: “I googled your symptoms and it looks like you have ‘network connectivity issues’”
magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 1 month ago
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 month ago
I think that part of the issue is quantity and volume. You submit a few papers a year, an AI can in theory submit a few per minute. Even if you filter 98% of them, mistakes will happen.
That said, this particular error in the meme is egregious.
bitfucker@programming.dev 1 month ago
I am still baffled by the rat dick illustration that got past the review
maculata@aussie.zone 1 month ago
RAT DICK,
RAT DICK,
WHATCHA GONNA DO…
AlolanYoda@mander.xyz 5 weeks ago
dck