Subsidized cost effectiveness.
Comment on It is very therapeutic to garden, though.
Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 years ago
'Cost effectives’ when not counting all the costs of monoculturing all the things.
tastysnacks@programming.dev 2 years ago
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 years ago
I think the hypothetical here implies transport would still exist for a primarily home-garden non-industrial agriculture replacement system. Or do you think the whole world should suddenly stop trading? Might as well since we’re writing a fantasy fiction, anything goes.
Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Most “cost effective” things are only that if you don’t count Negative Externalities.
The obvious example is fossil fuels.