Tbf the fact that it failed kinda proves his point, and the fact that the ok symbol is “now a nazi dogwhistle” (or, like, that whole “swastika” thing. disproves your second point.)
Tbf the fact that it failed kinda proves his point, and the fact that the ok symbol is “now a nazi dogwhistle” (or, like, that whole “swastika” thing. disproves your second point.)
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 months ago
There was already a large, active movement that had adopted the symbol. None such movement existed for the “OK” hand gesture.
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
Can’t tell if you’re saying the hindus/other cultures had used the swastika for years and so that’s why the nazis were able to steal it (which would seem to be applicable to the pride flag as well, also an established symbol,) or that the nazis were able to adopt the OK symbol because it wasn’t well established as a symbol for one group, but rather a general signal for “Ok” since like wwii.
In any case, I doubt it, if that were the reason why wouldn’t they have been successful in taking the swastika but not the pride flag, both established symbols? Much more likely that it didn’t work “because we didn’t let it” which kinda seems to be his entire point imo.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 months ago
The swastika was not widely used in the western world.
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
www.bbc.com/news/magazine-29644591