If memory serves, Custodes, unlike Space Marines, were not specified as being male-only, it was only implied (by never mentioning any female Custodes). As the process for making Custodes and Space Marines is vastly different, fan speculation on female Custodes has been around for a while.
Comment on Never make the mistake of visiting a community for your favorite podcasts
GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 month agoIt is a bit more nuanced than that, AFAIK they added female versions of a specific subset of human military, which for all this time were explicitly male with various lore reasons supporting that fact.
I’m not involved on the hobby myself but went on the occasional lore reading spree on the wikis, as s disclaimer. But I can understand that fans are upset about retcons such as this, where there wasn’t much ambiguity in the lore to squeeze the change in, making it a pretty hard lore break
PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
metaStatic@kbin.social 1 month ago
it's 100% because of the gaslighting.
tell me it wouldn't be the most 40k/Metal thing to just let women throw themselves at the training with zero prejudice and the 0.000001% that survive are just so much better than the men because the odds where so much worse. You could even hard retcon that in and no one would be mad because it's plausible that it's just never happened before so of course it's never been in the lore.
it's not like GW are bad at this sort of thing either, they got people to accept Primaris marines and that's a much bigger load of horseshit from a lore perspective.
Cypher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Hmmm Custodes don’t ever get a choice about their training. They start being modified from infancy.
It’s constantly amusing to me how many lore purists get simple stuff wrong that is spelt out in the Codexes.