Comment on Cum
thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
it’s pro hoc, not cum hoc. which is to not say that it is not objectively, very funny.
lapes@kbin.social 5 months ago
nahuse@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
In this case, then, it would be pro hoc, since the crankiness comes after the not eating.
CTDummy@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
nahuse@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Yeah, that’s what I mean.
The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
Quik@infosec.pub 5 months ago
I think you might mean “post hoc…” which is a more specific case of “cum hoc…” and sets focus on time/order of events
4am@lemm.ee 5 months ago
ha ha your mom hock my cum every night thru my jorts lol gottem