Comment

Comment on Gender-specific toilets to be required in non-residential buildings in England

That would be a ‘universal’ toilet and thus allowed.

According to ministers, 81% agreed with the intention for separate single-sex toilet facilities in a consultation on the proposals, while 82% also agreed with the intention to provide “universal” toilets – a self-contained, and a fully enclosed toilet room with a wash hand basin for individual use – where space allows.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Adkml@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
God these people are fucking stupid.

That’s a gender neutral bathroom.

It doesn’t mean there’s a stripper pole and a doctor handing out hormones.

source
- Barabas@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  The thing they’re against is communal handwashing apparently.
  
  source
  - Wolfman86@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Well…that’s where it starts.
    
    source
    mannycalavera@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    First comes hand washing, next comes gender recognition, next comes TRANSVESTITE BABIES in baby carriages!!!
    
    source
  - Yor@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    This honestly feels like a bit at this point
    
    source
- mynachmadarch@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Wait, your bathrooms don't have a doctor handing out shots hanging around in the corner?
  
  source
  - Emperor@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Wait, your bathrooms don’t have stripper poles?
    
    source
    mynachmadarch@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    It's unsanitary. Don't want nothin spreading. My kitchens though, let's just say my lasagna ain't the only thing cooking in there.
    
    source
llamajester421@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
What boggles me is that the latter "universal toilet" is what most conservatives ferociously battled when it is called a "gender neutral bathroom", like disabled bathrooms and residential ones. Face=palm.

source