I would argue most things in government should be ran in the black or red. There’s just a certain type of person who wants to turn everything Into a for profit.
Comment on Imagine denying other living and breathing lifeforms agency to thrive amd change lol lol lol
fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 year agoWe should really have representatives for non humans in government.
Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
flora_explora@beehaw.org 1 year ago
You may like Bruno Latour and his rather philosophical book Politics of Nature. I read it in a philosophy seminar and it seemed fascinating how the author tries to completely overthrow the view we have on “nature” and give it agency.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 year ago
Yes thank you. This is more helpful than you realise.
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
Can I just get Danny DeVito?
Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
It’s called environmental protection groups, animal rights groups, etc. Plenty don’t want to listen, though
fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 year ago
I mean literally representatives like senators not interest groups.
azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Who is going to keep them accountable? Trees have a record high abstention rate, and if these representatives are elected by humans that’s just proportional voting with veneer on top.
Democracy is about balancing levers, and that’s why there is more than one branch of government. Special interest groups do have power, and so does the judiciary (who may sue the government for unlawful cutting down of trees) and the executive (who may have power to declare certain government-owned land to be Protected).
The real ecologist move would be to write a duty to protect the environment into the constitution, so that the judiciary can strike down any law that does anything to the contrary.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 year ago
I believe at least one state—Wyoming, maybe—has a guarantee in its constitution that citizens will have a clean and healthy environment, or something along those lines. It effectively creates a duty to protect the environment.