Comment on Why do cameras call it "Macro Lens" if it zooms in and is used to capture tiny objects? Shouldn't it be "Micro Lens"?

ma11en@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Macro generally is when a lens will reproduce an object the same size on film/sensor as it is in life.

  Hey that’s pretty cool. Is it really what happens?

  source

  • ma11en@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Yep, most macro lenses such as the 90 to 105 range from Sigma, Canon, Nikon and their ilk tend to have a designation like 1:1 in the description.

    This is normally based on a 35mm frame size, for cropped sensors the magnification is greater.

    source

    • randombullet@programming.dev ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Actually for cropped sensors it’ll still be 1:1 but “cropped”

      You can get more magnification if you use extension tubes or specialized lenses.

      source

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Cropped by way of a smaller sensor, but magnified if you compare a “full frame sensor” camera and a “crop sensor” camera with identical pixel counts. A penny will have a penny-sized projection on the sensor, but the image from the crop sensor will have ~40% more pixels of the penny.

        source
  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Depends, I think. In the same order of magnitude definitely.

    source

    • randombullet@programming.dev ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I suppose tilt shift lenses can achieve that.

      source

      • Paragone@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        No, tilt-shift doesn’t have any bearing on whether it’s focal-length is high-enough to make the magnification 1:1…

        hth!

        _ /\ _

        source