Comment on Had to buy a certain product to use a certain substance and there's a really stupid new law.

• FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  So can cocktail shakers. So is there a need to sign for a cocktail shaker?

  And, again, read the article. This is about tobacco. It’s very clear.

  source

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    A cocktail shaker isn’t required to consume cannabis or tobacco…

    I’ve read the article, can you not understand that both are illegal for minors to consume, so going to head shop instead of a Tabacco shop isn’t suddenly going to make it legal to sell to minors dude……

    source

    • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      How about this? You provide evidence to support the idea that this law was in any way intended to restrict minors from using cannabis. I’ll wait.

      source

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        • It prevented minors from buying. The ultimate goal was to limit the pathways that tobacco and related products can get to minors. There was a greater emphasis on online retail because it was harder to track the age of consumers.

        A vape is a tobacco product and a cannabis product.

        “Related” fits the term for cannabis, both are illegal to sell to minors, and both are usually covered by the same law.

        Give your head a shake dude, you think you can buy this just because you want to use it for CBD when it can absolutely be bought and used by a minor if it’s “for cannabis” and not tobacco….?

        source

        • -> View More Comments