Comment on Had to buy a certain product to use a certain substance and there's a really stupid new law.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 7 months ago
- It prevented minors from buying. The ultimate goal was to limit the pathways that tobacco and related products can get to minors. There was a greater emphasis on online retail because it was harder to track the age of consumers.
A vape is a tobacco product and a cannabis product.
“Related” fits the term for cannabis, both are illegal to sell to minors, and both are usually covered by the same law.
Give your head a shake dude, you think you can buy this just because you want to use it for CBD when it can absolutely be bought and used by a minor if it’s “for cannabis” and not tobacco….?
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Now you’re being dishonest. You have no idea what “and related products” means, you’re just guessing. That is not evidence to support your claim.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Is tobacco illegal to sell to minors?
Is cannabis illegal to sell to minors?
If the answer to both of these questions are yes, and you are still arguing, you need to seriously re-read cannabis and tobacco laws….
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Again, that is not evidence that PACT was intended to restrict minors from using cannabis. It doesn’t sound like you have evidence.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 7 months ago
……
Do you seriously want them to make a second law when tobacco already covers the sale to minor part? I’m sure most other people can draw this parallel…