Your article makes clear that the amendment to the PACT Act makes it apply broadly.
..."any electronic device that, through an aerosolized solution, delivers nicotine, flavor or any other substance to the user inhaling from the device.”
The article is about how vendors are going to have a difficult time confirming to the new regulations.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Do you not comprehend this can be used for stuff illegally for minor, so hence the need to sign to prove not a minor…?
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 months ago
So can cocktail shakers. So is there a need to sign for a cocktail shaker?
And, again, read the article. This is about tobacco. It’s very clear.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 7 months ago
A cocktail shaker isn’t required to consume cannabis or tobacco…
I’ve read the article, can you not understand that both are illegal for minors to consume, so going to head shop instead of a Tabacco shop isn’t suddenly going to make it legal to sell to minors dude……
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 months ago
How about this? You provide evidence to support the idea that this law was in any way intended to restrict minors from using cannabis. I’ll wait.