Comment on In movies a strong woman is manly. (big muscles, aggressive, punches people, etc.) Is that really the way it is?

• xmunk@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  In movies a strong woman is manly. (big muscles, aggressive, punches people, etc.) Is that really the way it is?

  I’m confused, maybe you could try rewording your question?

  source

  • spiderwort@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Ahh, I see the issue now. Elsewhere in the thtead it was pointed out.

    I meant “strong character”. Big willpower. Driven. Uncompromising. That kind of thing.

    Not powerlifter.

    source

    • drcouzelis@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Big willpower. Driven. Uncompromising. That kind of thing.

      I think that is the answer. :)

      I’m trying to think of examples from famous recent movies with women who have that description…

      From Disney:

      • Moana from Moana
      • Joy from Inside Out
      • Anna and Elsa from Frozen and the sequel
      • Mirabel from Encanto

      Have you seen any of those movies? If not, what movies have you seen?

      source
    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I think we’re moving away from the emotionally strong woman being buff/masculine theme but originally I assume this theme was misogynistic in origin “this woman is so strong she can make it on her own - she doesn’t even need a man… and since we assume a man being present is necessary for survival it’s not that she doesn’t need a man - it’s that she’s her own man! There now we have a strong female character without eroding our own preconceived gender hierarchy. Technically a woman can survive on her own - as long as she’s a man!”

      Honestly, you’ll get this read off a lot of early female villains and in trashy movies they’ll queer code her because obviously the female villain (who is functionally a man writing-wise) needs a wife of her own.

      source
• Stamau123@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • spiderwort@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I just forgot who I was talking to. Sorry. See elsewhere in the thread for clarification.

    source