That’s how Thor’s idea works. You choose your proxy. You don’t elect them without the option to change until the next election. You can switch proxies or take over directly at literally any time.
That’s how Thor’s idea works. You choose your proxy. You don’t elect them without the option to change until the next election. You can switch proxies or take over directly at literally any time.
Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
I don’t want to choose a proxy, I want a direct say. The only person I want representing me, is me.
Ilandar@aussie.zone 5 months ago
???
You don’t have to, that’s the entire point of the proxy; it’s for people who can’t/don’t want to vote on every single issue. Clearly you’re not one of these people so there’s no actual issue here, you’re just arguing for argument’s sake.
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 5 months ago
Though I should argue that democracy is not functioning if people cannot care about issues due to needing to work excessively in order to eat and have free time. People shouldn’t be worrying about what they’re going to eat or where they’re going to live but about policy that affects them
Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 months ago
Ok then? But why should your preference to do it that way dictate how everyone must do it?
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 5 months ago
@Zagorath@aussie.zone @Deceptichum@kbin.social
What about the best of both worlds? You can cast you own vote or you can hire a proxy to vote on your behalf. Obviously we would need some regulation on what is basically selling votes. But by making it an expense people are incentivised to do it themselves and you have the power to remove their proxy status at any point
Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 months ago
No different to the potential for the same problem today in representative elections.
Ilandar@aussie.zone 5 months ago
That is actually what was proposed by the candidate @Zagorath@aussie.zone was referring to.