Comment on 😠Meta just showed off Threads’ fediverse integration for the very first time😠

MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• thingsiplay@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  To be fair, it is understandable decision, as it would copy and connect data / posts to other servers automatically. On the other hand most people don’t care or understand what this is about and probably never enable it. Still better than nothing in my opinion. Hopefully all new users get a notification and popup to ask if they want to join the Fediverse too. And new user account registration will probably show an option too at registration time.

  source

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Seems unlikely. This is Meta’s malicious compliance with MDA or whatever from the EU.

    source

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      At what exactly do you refer to? Meta does not need to federate with the Fediverse. I am not aware of any law that would force Meta doing this.

      source

      • Lionir@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        The DMA has clauses that force big companies that are considered “gatekeepers” to allow interoperability with other services.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • jarfil@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      How is it “malicious”?

      source

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        We don’t know yet the full answer to that but I’d say being “opt in” without any sort of prompt ( especially when every other fucking Meta feature is “opt out” ), or having unidirectional federation would qualify as malicious.

        source
• BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Meta will probably be pretty cautious and strict about what inbound content is allowed, since they have a global quagmire of laws and regulations to comply with and cannot just open up the firehose without significant legal risk. I'd imagine they'd only accept content from vetted instances that agree to some amount of common policy.

  source

  • jarfil@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The whole thing is a preemptive move for EU laws requiring “gatekeepers” to allow interoperability with their ecosystem. Facebook is likely to accept any EU registered instance that is also subject to EU laws… and they may not bother with instances from regions that don’t require them to do so.

    source