Look at the implications of what yourself is saying and then you’ll notice that your two comments promote right-wing discourses, through your irrationality. What you’re saying effectively is the same as saying one of those two things:

• Right wing discourses are highly convincing for rational people, unlike left wing ones. OR
• People are a bunch of irrationals who can’t “sieve” discourses based on rationality.

This shit is not a taboo dammit. You can - and should - sieve through the statements of any political discourse, between what’s true vs. false or moral vs. immoral. And when you do this with most right-wing discourses, you find so much babble that it’s easy to discard; or at least irreconcilable moral premises. It’s safer than you’re pretending that it is.

(NB: this is coming from a heavy smoker and a communist.)