Dear We are very sorry for this error that occurred, as we provided an incorrect version when submitting the revised paper, as we did not use AI tools to write anything, but one of the authors did, and we removed this paragraph, as this entire paragraph does not add anything to our article.( It seems that I did not save the modifications). We wrote the conclusion ourselves, without resorting to artificial intelligence tools. We hope you understand what happened, and we are very sorry. Here you can find the conclusion that we wrote ourselves Conclusion In conclusion, proper treatment of iatrogenic vascular injuries is dependent on an accurate assessment of the stage of the injury. The injury should be recognized quickly. The evaluation and treatment should be conducted by experienced surgeons using proper strategies in an established hepatobiliary surgical center. Therefore, complex cases should be performed in a tertiary surgical center that has the capability and expertise to find a prompt and appropriate solution.
I understand that English probably isn’t his first language, but this reads like he used ChatGPT to write his apology
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 months ago
WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 3 months ago
The author is in the comments apologizing for the mistake.
BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 months ago
I understand that English probably isn’t his first language, but this reads like he used ChatGPT to write his apology
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 months ago
The people who run the journal are more at fault here.
OpenStars@startrek.website 3 months ago
It looks more like there are multiple people to blame here for this cluster-fuck? :-P
gregorum@lemm.ee 3 months ago
“Editorial review performed by AI”