Comment on A post may receive a hundred replies and host a fat and exciting conversation tree, but if one moderator doesn't like it then it may be locked or deleted. Is that immoral?

<- View Parent
jordanlund@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

The “initial situation” is that OP has had 2 posts removed from here for breaking the rules and is butthurt over it.

lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&userId=5761834

One for rule 1:

Removed Post “Exception implies deficiency. Am I the only one who sees this?”

“Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.”

Yeah “am I the only…” is not a legitimate question. I can see why that got removed.

One for rule 5:

Removed Post “Focus your attention, part of the world becomes sharper and brighter, another part fades away and disappears. With habit even the focusing becomes invisible. How much has disappeared?”

“Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.”

I don’t even know what’s going on with that question. Seems to be borderline trolling/im14andthisisdeep material.

source
Sort:hotnewtop