Comment on So, what gun control would have stopped the Kansas City shooting?
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 8 months ago1619 has serious errors in it. Teaching people lies isn’t education.
Education is teaching people facts and how to think.
People need to be willing to support their schools
Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Well that’s what you have been told, and here you are repeating it. As with evolution, sex education and the other examples, someone benefits from the mischaracterization and opposition to information being presented. They come up with ridiculous sounding bullshit and rely on others to repeat that bullshit. I can’t speak directly to the 1619 project, I don’t know much about it. I only know that some of the people in my social circles that got all worked up about it are people I consider dumber than ditch water.
We are talking about education as a means of reducing or preventing gun violence - the topic you started. It’s my contention that as soon as you introduce an educational program aimed at reducing gun violence, someone is going to come along and say something like: “these dang freedom-hating libruls claim law-abiding responsible hunters are a bunch of violent psycho murders! They’re only tryin to put food on the table for their families. We must stop these communists fixin to take away our guns!”
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 8 months ago
It’s not what I’ve been told. It’s full of misinformation.
Woosh. You missed the whole point of his statement. It isn’t education on gun violence. It’s education in general. Education reduces violence.
You want to teach god knows what when the studies are about education.
Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Was that the whole point? Ha, woosh indeed.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Yes. It’s not teaching about gun violence but education in general.
…umich.edu/…/public-school-investment-reduces-adu…
cepr.org/voxeu/…/why-education-reduces-crime