Comment on Anon's friend gets exposed
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 hours ago100 could date a 57 year old. 12 yo a 13 yo but not a 12 yo.
Works perfectly.
Comment on Anon's friend gets exposed
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 hours ago100 could date a 57 year old. 12 yo a 13 yo but not a 12 yo.
Works perfectly.
FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 20 hours ago
What the rule is saying there is that a 12 year old shouldn’t date, because that region of the graph is actually outside of the lower and upper bounds, which intercept (cross) at “14 years old” on the x axis
Or you could interpret the UB and LB as having swapped, in which case 12’s LB is (-7, ×2) =10 years old.
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 hours ago
I’m just musing it’s kind of stupid to make it a math problem “one size fits all”. Who the hell should have the right to tell 50 year grownups they can’t date lol.