I’ve always thought that it’s more ‘we need more women than men to repopulate our country after the war’ as us men are nearly useless when making new life to this planet. But obviously that idea is ‘a bit’ dated too today.
Comment on Why do we need legal genders at all?
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days agoThat one isn’t a feminist law, that’s a fascist one, under the fasc ideal “women are too weak to fight!”
IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 4 days ago
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
It can be all 3 things.
But no matter what, it’s outdated
Nemo@slrpnk.net 4 days ago
It’s less “women are too weak” and more “the point if war is to kill off excess young men so there’s more young women available for powerful older men”
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
It can be both
myyass@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Like it or not that women will guaranteed face harsh realities.
Iraq.
A line of “Iraqi military” taking turns at a boy. Nothing you can do about it.
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
what
myyass@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s just one example of how fucked up things can get. You’re patrol and you see that, you can’t do anything because “we’re allies to the iraqi army now.”