Hmmm nah, they have a database of everyone with a licence plus the guy even said they can see the light of the TV through the windows.
Still think it’s scaremongering
Comment on BBC to force more to pay licence fee with ‘YouTube tax’
towerful@programming.dev 2 days agoExcept they did actually exist and did actually work.
youtu.be/U8mSHKsyWDw
Well, for analog CRTs
Hmmm nah, they have a database of everyone with a licence plus the guy even said they can see the light of the TV through the windows.
Still think it’s scaremongering
SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Yeah, all the info in that video is super sketchy, the em interference signal it refers to would be detectable within a few inches at most with today’s technology
Fluke@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Uh huh.
Mate, I can hear the squealing whine of a flyback transformer through brick walls with my own ears. I DO NOT miss the days when everyone had two or three of the fucking things screaming away all day.
Detecting the magnetic flux those things produce isn’t magic, tricky, or a cover-up. It just requires a sensitive antenna array tuned to the right frequency.
Now, since the shift to flat panel displays a TV doesn’t announce it’s presence in such an obvious fashion. This makes detecting a TV a much more difficult prospect, arguably not impossible, but not likely within their budget nowadays.