Comment on BBC to force more to pay licence fee with ‘YouTube tax’
blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Remember the scare stories of the TV licence vans
Comment on BBC to force more to pay licence fee with ‘YouTube tax’
blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Remember the scare stories of the TV licence vans
towerful@programming.dev 2 days ago
Except they did actually exist and did actually work.
youtu.be/U8mSHKsyWDw
Well, for analog CRTs
SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Yeah, all the info in that video is super sketchy, the em interference signal it refers to would be detectable within a few inches at most with today’s technology
Fluke@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Uh huh.
Mate, I can hear the squealing whine of a flyback transformer through brick walls with my own ears. I DO NOT miss the days when everyone had two or three of the fucking things screaming away all day.
Detecting the magnetic flux those things produce isn’t magic, tricky, or a cover-up. It just requires a sensitive antenna array tuned to the right frequency.
Now, since the shift to flat panel displays a TV doesn’t announce it’s presence in such an obvious fashion. This makes detecting a TV a much more difficult prospect, arguably not impossible, but not likely within their budget nowadays.
blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Hmmm nah, they have a database of everyone with a licence plus the guy even said they can see the light of the TV through the windows.
Still think it’s scaremongering