Comment on [deleted]

<- View Parent
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

I’m not sure what you mean by “it doesn’t follow.” It absolutely does.

If you use a tool for one specific task, and that tool is also useful for other, functionally identical tasks, you’re probably going to use that tool for the second task.

Like if a carpenter uses a Stanley #4 bench plane to finish a table top, they’re probably also going to use it for finish a cabinet’s top or side walls, etc.

Similarly, if a carpenter uses a jig saw to cross cut a board, it’s likely they’re also perfectly okay with using powered drills.

So if someone uses generative ai to create a thumbnail for the video, they’re likely to use it to create other graphics in the video.

If someone uses generative ai for those tasks, they’re also likely to use LLMs or other ai tools for other tasks.

Some one already using Ai is more likely to use AI again.

I don’t care whose fault it is, content creators aren’t entitled to my clicks. I have no obligation to click any video on YouTube, never mind watch the full thing.

If the thumbnail is ai slop, I have exactly zero reasons to believe the rest of it won’t also have ai slop. The creator can make whatever choices they want.

But I have no obligation to that creator. So when I decide that the use of AI is unethical, and pass on any video that uses it- that’s fully my choice. Similarly peole snarking on the comments or downvoting it… that’s also their choice. (I’m not even sure its legitimately a brigade. Knowing nothing else about the matter, I’m skeptical.)

source
Sort:hotnewtop