They’ve publicly declared to their investors that they can’t expect a growth market anymore (perhaps because of RAMpocalypse, or maybe consoles were just tapped out anyway), so they’re instead focusing on maximizing revenue per user.
They’ve publicly declared to their investors that they can’t expect a growth market anymore (perhaps because of RAMpocalypse, or maybe consoles were just tapped out anyway), so they’re instead focusing on maximizing revenue per user.
artyom@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
And how is this contributing to “revenue per user”?
Janx@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
When you can no longer play any game on your PlayStation, unless it’s through them? No lending, and nothing is ever on sale unless it’s approved by them and they get their cut?? Yeah, that’s a monopoly, and even if we don’t like it or avoid the platform, they will make more money from every user who remains…
ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
There are far higher profit margins on digital copies compared to physical.
artyom@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Why wouldn’t they just increase the prices on physical copies to compensate?
ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Historically, because they don’t want to piss off their brick and mortar retail partners. Someone like Walmart would just stop carrying their product if they’re getting a raw deal out of it. These days, Nintendo is doing exactly that, but at some point, if Sony’s charging $90 physical for a $70 digital game, you’re already convincing your customers to just stop buying physical anyway, so they’ll also save the money they’d have to spend on manufacturing the disc drive in the first place.
iamthetot@piefed.ca 3 weeks ago
Have you seen how anyone reacts when prices are raised, especially on video games?
redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 3 weeks ago
By deciding what each user can and be willing to pay. Everyone gets different pricing via their account on the store based on their purchase history. Can’t do that with physical discs.