That’s probably for three reasons:
- some “interesting” UI decision in GIMP
- force of habits
- GIMP is not a replacement for photoshop
Photoshop merges two very different things, editing and drawing. If you do only editing, GIMP is great. If you also do drawing/painting, GIMP is completely subpar, but Krita is fantastic.
There’s also other tools of course. But GIMP, by itself, is not close to be a remplacement for all of photoshop.
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 day ago
“Use gimp to replace photoshop!” - Linux users
“GIMP is not a replacement for photoshop” - Also linux users
bstix@feddit.dk 13 hours ago
Maybe there are as many different Linux users as there are Photoshop alternatives.
At least 2-3…I mean, some day, there will be as many Linux users.
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
One can hope