Fossil fuels, petrochemical refining and usage, industrialized meat “farming,” clothing/fast fashion, cement.
Comment on 103°F in Los Angeles all week
Malica@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
No it isn’t.
ElChinchilla@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Comment on 103°F in Los Angeles all week
Malica@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
No it isn’t.
Fossil fuels, petrochemical refining and usage, industrialized meat “farming,” clothing/fast fashion, cement.
MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Tbf they voted for them
wpb@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
If you can vote for politician A and politician B, and both of them are bought by the fossil fuel companies, to what extent are you to blame?
And if citizens can be held accountable for the actions and choices that their goverment has made, and that government has committed war crime after war crime abroad, killing literal millions, does that mean citizens are a legitimate target for retaliatory attacks? Was the Dresden firebombing justified? Was 9/11 justified? Were the atomic bombs dropped on Japan justified?
davetortoise@reddthat.com 4 weeks ago
Your options are much greater than voting for politician A or politician B
wpb@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I was responding to
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
Not everyone is an American
wpb@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I figured people could extrapolate, but here goes for your benefit:
If you can vote for politicians P1 through PN where N is an integer greater than or equal to 1, and all of them are bought by the fossil fuel companies, to what extent are you to blame?
MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Democrats have a better record on climate than Republicans do
wpb@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Sure, but making it worse at a slightly slower rate is still making it worse. The most recent democratic presidential candidate was pro fracking.
Denfa@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Only so much as was necessary to keep the carrot on the stick
teuniac_@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
That only holds true for the US. Plenty of choice where I grew up.