Legally, you own a copy of a book if you buy the book even if you don’t also buy the copyright for the book, so wouldn’t be allowed to make copies (beyond the single backup copy your allowed to make in case the first is damaged that you’re required to destroy if you ever stop owning the one you bought). This also applied to physical copies of video games, at least when they were new. In the US, this is part of what’s known as the First Sale Doctrine, but other territories typically have stone equivalent even if it doesn’t have a name.
About a century ago, book publishers tried putting a licence in copies of books and claiming that if you bought them, you were only buying the licence, but stopped after courts decided that you’d still bought a copy of the book and a copy of the text of the licence, but hadn’t become party to the licence. When game (and other software) publishers tried it later, they were basically just allowed to, even though there’s not really anything that makes the First Sale Doctrine any less applicable to games than books.
I see your point, a few years ago while playing Halo on the xbox a guy said he pwned me. I later learned that pwned stood for owned. Since then I’d been worried that I got cloned (copied). Thank you for clarifying.
ourselves@slrpnk.net 3 weeks ago
I can resell the Camry I bought, but I cannot copy the complete design of Toyota’s Camry, build it and sell it as such.
AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Legally, you own a copy of a book if you buy the book even if you don’t also buy the copyright for the book, so wouldn’t be allowed to make copies (beyond the single backup copy your allowed to make in case the first is damaged that you’re required to destroy if you ever stop owning the one you bought). This also applied to physical copies of video games, at least when they were new. In the US, this is part of what’s known as the First Sale Doctrine, but other territories typically have stone equivalent even if it doesn’t have a name.
About a century ago, book publishers tried putting a licence in copies of books and claiming that if you bought them, you were only buying the licence, but stopped after courts decided that you’d still bought a copy of the book and a copy of the text of the licence, but hadn’t become party to the licence. When game (and other software) publishers tried it later, they were basically just allowed to, even though there’s not really anything that makes the First Sale Doctrine any less applicable to games than books.
musubibreakfast@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I see your point, a few years ago while playing Halo on the xbox a guy said he pwned me. I later learned that pwned stood for owned. Since then I’d been worried that I got cloned (copied). Thank you for clarifying.