Comment on How I cannot be worry??

• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I don’t think that’s true. Humans are incredibly good at solving problems, so I really don’t think “can’t” is really ever applicable. The tighter the spot, the more ingenuity it takes to solve the problem. But a solution can always be found or created.

  You may not be able to solve the program now, but you can probably do something to help you solve it later.

  source

  • philthi@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    This is reductive to the point of absurdity, if this were true no one would ever die from any problem (i.e. drowning, falling, etc.) They’d simply activate ingenuity.

    Some problems do not have a solution in a given circumstance.

    E.g. I’m locked in a prison on a sinking ship that’s already 1km underwater, and my cell is completely full of water and I’ve held my breath for 2 minutes now.

    source

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I should’ve added “given enough time” to that statement.

      My take is that if you accept that there’s nothing you can do, then that’s it. If you don’t accept that, you have a chance of improving the outcome, even if it’s small. Giving up never improves your outcomes, there’s always something you can try that both won’t make things worse and might make things better.

      In your scenario, you have two options: accept death or try something. Since you aren’t going to make it worse, you might as well try something. Some options:

      • pick the lock
      • break the lock
      • squeeze through the bars
      • try to use magic to grow gills or something

      Literally any of those has a higher chance of success than doing nothing, and if you had more time, one of the first three might even work. If by some miracle you get out, the next step is to look for a pocket oh air. And so on. Take it one step at a time.

      source

      • philthi@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Ok, I can agree with this logic “it’s better to try than to give in” much more than “there’s always a solution”.

        That to me still leaves some people starving of hunger due to a lack of money and an excess of bills. But I agree that even in that horrible situation it’s better to keep trying than give in.

        I was worried the argument here was closer to “you’re in this terrible situation because you didn’t try enough” which I wholeheartedly disagree with.

        I feel now that we’re in agreement though?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • orcrist@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Of course there are unsolvable problems. This is true in both theory and practice. If your family member has late-stage cancer, let’s suppose.

    source
• saze@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Humans are incredible at filtering, therefore a solution can float right on by if it isn’t the “right one”. Also solutions to most problems come by as a result of completely unrelated activity. Therefore it is incredibly important to be doing something, anything that isn’t directly destructive to your goals.

  source