Uhh…who exactly are the “victims” in a bestiality incident? 🤨
Comment on A tale as old as time...
snooggums@piefed.world 2 days agoThe FBI quietly issued guidance this past spring lifting a categorical hiring ban on applicants who had previously engaged in prostitution, and said that it would instead consider the context of the behaviour in at least some cases. The bureau made a similar change regarding bestiality.
“We did not want to punish victims of bestiality, victims who were trafficked. We did not want to make it an automatic disqualification for the FBI to consider you,” Patel said.
If thay was what they meant they should have written about ’not excluding victims of’ instead of ‘consider the context’.
xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day 2 days ago
snooggums@piefed.world 2 days ago
Often prostitutes who are only doing it to survive.
Those women are not applying to be in the FBI though, which is why I doubt that is who Patel is claiming are being kept from becoming agents.
ttayh@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
The israeli iof used dogs to rape palestinians.
I am willing to put money down that similar things happened on Epstein island, his texas (I think it was texas) ranch, and in a certain florida golf club
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 days ago
Well yeah. Just because you were abused as a pup, does not mean you can’t be a police dog. What justice is that?
Makeitstop@lemmy.world 2 days ago
If that was actually the intent they could have avoided all the drama by adding broader language to the entire document allowing exceptions on a case by case basis for prohibited behaviors which occurred while the applicant was a victim of trafficking and coercion. This sounds a lot more like an excuse made after the fact to defend an indefensible decision.
I really hope someone in congress follows up on this and demands to know how many agents were hired with these behaviors on their record, and of those how many had been identified as victims of trafficking. Make them go on record with it.