Peer reviewed?
Comment on never forget
RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip 1 week agoThe University of Alaska Fairbanks did a report that concluded that the fire didn’t lead to the collapse
deHaga@feddit.uk 1 week ago
Shindo66@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Theres been so many studies by incredibly reputable people. They aren’t going to believe no matter how much is said. At this point they’re worse than the maga people. Their believing in the lie has cost millions of deaths in the middle east through global imperialism. They dont want that blood on their hands and its finally gone into a war with Iran that will never end. The people who you are asking to tell you the truth wouldnt even tell you that the building was so full of hazardous building materials that it was going to give untold amounts of people cancer.
SirLeToet@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Was it the WTC7 sized chunk of the north tower that fell on top of it?
Crazy how they conspiracied that.
W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.