Respectfully: no.
Psychosis is something that builds over time with many factors and AI is one that can definitely be one of the contributing factors. It can be the one that pushes someone over the edge into psychosis and that may seem as “revealing” it but the psychosis could have been avoided without.
This line of thinking feels dangerous to me.
angband@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
That “build-up” you are talking about, that’s called business school followed by entry level management or internship, where modern managers brush over learning their business, in favor of seeking efficiency purely in terms of dollars in/dollars out, in opposition to any other metric.
Gap@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Idunno man, sounds like you’re trying to shift the blame from AI inducing psychosis in people ( pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12712562/ ) towards the people affected by it
angband@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
No, like the article said: “it’s not as if the current industry problems are unprecedented, or came out of nowhere. Since the advent of modern capitalism (and likely a long while before that), those in charge have often misunderstood, underestimated, or dismissed the hard work that goes into labour they don’t understand.”
This and a tendency to abuse workers have always existed. Management isn’t the victim here, the AI has just removed the limiter, such as it was.
Jax@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
Are you suggesting the ‘line must go up’ mentality only emerged after the advent of AI?
Gap@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
No.
I’m mad about the misrepresentation of psychosis