Gap
@Gap@lemmy.world
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 4 days ago:
Lol
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 4 days ago:
Am I?
Cuz the way it looks to me we’re both simply trying to discuss something different.
Where the point I’m trying to get across is: “If you lay the blame solely on the people getting psychosis then you’re actively covering up the harm AI can do” With this in mind: when I read your comments your point is interpreted as: “Psychosis is something that’s guaranteed to happen because you’re born with it, AI doesn’t influence it”
Whereas the point you’re trying to make is probably more in line with “AI didn’t suddenly make CEO’s greedier, they already were and blaming AI for that rather than capitalism, is bad”
The problem then lies within the expectation of how discussions on the internet go. By going into the “I need to win” mindset which the internet comments are famous for. Its easy to fall into the mindset of being opponents rather than 2 people trying to convey what they think is important. I believe we both entered this mindset somewhere through the argument.
Look, I can’t know what you find important because you’ve ignored my questions and instead opted to attack my (sometimes shaky) arguments instead. Which is fair but this doesn’t help in opening the conversation to new perspectives. It more or less turns it into a debate instead.
This time however its clear you’ve given up on trying to communicate your point. Which is a shame because I was trying to understand it. I even think I’ll be able to if you give me context to your thought process similarly as to how I just tried.
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 4 days ago:
“AI might feed their disease, but it was already there, and it didn’t hallucinate them into psychosis - they have always been right on the edge.”
Is a contradiction. Being on the edge of psychosis is not the same as being in one. Within this part you both claim that AI doesn’t hallucinate them into psychosis because they were already on the edge.
So your argument is “AI doesn’t hallucinate people into psychosis it just pushes them over the edge”
Which is exactly what hallucinating someone into psychosis means.
Why are you defending AI?
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 6 days ago:
What is darvo?
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 6 days ago:
Did AI remove the limiter? Or is it actively pushing people towards delusion by agreeing with whats being said and validating the persons delusionary thoughts as how reality works?
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 6 days ago:
Or they’re lying for money rather than suffering from a mental condition.
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 6 days ago:
You’re making the assumption that all “bosses” mentioned in the article are people seeking infinite growth.
You’re making an assumption about a group of people you know nothing about and trying to link them with people suffering from psychosis. Essentially grouping “people suffering from psychosis” together with “greedy CEO’s”. Whereas greedy CEO’s could also simply be narcissistic, selfish or just evil.
By grouping them with psychosis sufferers you’re denying the sufferers their humanity.
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 1 week ago:
No.
I’m mad about the misrepresentation of psychosis
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 1 week ago:
Idunno man, sounds like you’re trying to shift the blame from AI inducing psychosis in people ( pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12712562/ ) towards the people affected by it
- Comment on Dwarf Fortress' creator says the industry's in shambles over AI and layoff-happy CEOs: 'Everyone I know, their bosses are slowly getting psychosis' 1 week ago:
Respectfully: no.
Psychosis is something that builds over time with many factors and AI is one that can definitely be one of the contributing factors. It can be the one that pushes someone over the edge into psychosis and that may seem as “revealing” it but the psychosis could have been avoided without.
This line of thinking feels dangerous to me.
- Comment on Why I gave up electronics club 7 months ago:
If I make a model of gravity which says that earth has a gravity of 1000000 m/s^2 then that model would be wrong.
No morality question at all.
Your comment however feels like an AI trying to justify the existence of AI models through the argument of “guns don’t kill people, people kill people”
- Comment on Anon plays GTA V 11 months ago:
I haven’t found any purchaseable content other than those bought with in-game currency. Is this something you unlock in newgame+? Or do I need to join a religion for it
- Comment on The news did it first 2 years ago:
The right has a tiktok with multiple videos playing at the same time in order to increase the average watch time of every viewer so it goes further in the algorithm.
The left has the news combined with other news things at the same time (in order to increase watch time as well I assume)
OP makes the revelation that both are doing the same. Namely adding more content in small windows in order to increase watchtime.
This is funny because it’s generally considered low quality (as I consider it low quality and therefore everyone does) and the news doing the same means that said news is also low quality and probably should be avoided.
- Comment on The news did it first 2 years ago:
It’s the same thing