American movies it’s becoming like hard core porn
Which ones? For, you know, fact-checking. Because all the US movies I’ve seen lately show a lot more violence than love sex. Maybe you’re just watching 80s movies?
Comment on Why is the approach to nudity and sex in films and tv so vastly different between the US and Europe?
Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 days ago
IDK, I just think that movies where the actors are having sex that competes with porn movies is incredibly stupid and boring and doesn’t add anything to the movie. It’s like if we had similar scenes of the actors taking a poop. Like WTF are we seeing that for?
It’s not edgy, it’s not liberating, it’s just stupid and boring and honestly 99 times out of 100 off-putting.
IDK why the fuck they do it? One thing is if it’s a short clip, that an be OK, but in some movies these clips a freaking LONG, like yes we get it, they slept together, does the scene have to be sop long so I could go to the bathroom and not miss anything?
Or am I weird, do people find it hot?
Usually in European movies it’s shorter and done more elegantly, American movies it’s becoming like hard core porn.
makr_alland@lemmy.world 4 days ago
HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 3 days ago
American movies it’s becoming like hard core porn.
lol what the hell are you on about? The only non-porn movies where I’ve seen a actual penis actually go into a actual vagina, have been European. French mostly. And its not like there’s one or two of those, there’s like a dozen of those every year.
jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
Why don’t you cite concrete examples so we can have a rational discussion instead of everyone just responding to the images in their own head?
Steve@communick.news 4 days ago
If it’s off-putting, it’s not boring.
If it’s off-putting, it literally is edgy.
If one represses something off-putting, it’s very liberating to reveal it.
You’re right about one thing. You don’t know why they do it.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 days ago
It’s off-putting because it’s stupid, and being stupid is nor edgy.
s38b35M5@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Why make any movie? Days of Thunder? So what? He races a car. We get it. Just play the opening credits and the end credits back to back. My Left Foot? Some people have one leg. Big deal. Why do see have to see him struggling? It’s like someone taking a dump. Just show the ball going into the net. Actually, I have PTSD about getting his with a ball. Just do the credits end to end again.
Why do we need to see things any single person could be slightly offended by? Star Wars? Come on. We all now how battles go, and, dude; like, why do see have to see oppression and poverty or extreme fascism? Those nine movies could just be a greeting card with “may the force be with you” inside.
/s
Just because you don’t appreciate creative works doesn’t make them unworthy of expression. Nobody is forcing anyone to watch anything.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 days ago
You are making a straw man argument.
TheFogan@programming.dev 4 days ago
I mean it’s fair to say in some movies there’s jarring scenes that pull from the rest of the concept of the movie. IE if you are watching a rom com, and they decide to throw in a 30 minute chase scene, it’s likely to detract from rather than add to the movie. Some scenes bundle well, some scenes bore half of the audience, and would have done better as seperate things.
It’s always fair to complain about parts of a movie that you didn’t like, because the quantity of complaints on the whole either encourages the existing movie makers to shift their movies, or in the best case scenerio, encourages someone else to make a movie more focused on the things you like without the parts you don’t.
Steve@communick.news 4 days ago
Stupid isn’t off-putting. Stupid is annoying, disappointing, sometimes funny.
jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
“Stupid” is not a hypothesis, it’s a lack of one.