Detection of AI is based on a list. Not some form of intelligent keyword matching algorithm.
“You said you wanted no AI, so we gave you no AI!”
Comment on DuckDuckGo's "hide ai images" option still shows AI images that are clearly tagged on the site
Ja7sh_The_Donkey@piefed.zip 1 week ago
DDG uses public lists among other things, their claim.
Detection of AI is based on a list. Not some form of intelligent keyword matching algorithm.
grue@lemmy.world 1 week ago
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
It can still be mildly infuriating
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 week ago
Is there an open source browser add-on for it yet? I think this is gonna be just as vital as ublock origins is right now. The internet will soon just be unusable without filtering out AI content.
Kraiden@piefed.social 1 week ago
Ye, this. It’s not really their fault. There’s no protocol for responsible sites to flag AI content to the search engines. They can’t really be expected to examine each and every site’s bespoke tagging system for their specific way of declaring AI imagery. I hope that changes soon, and DDG could be the pioneers of it if they wanted.
halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 1 week ago
Isn’t this one of the things that embedding C2PA in generated images is supposed to help with? Even though it predates the current AI bubble, it is a provenance system. With a quick search, it seems like many of the big players are on board already.