This image is precisely the first thing that came to my mind.
Comment on Capitalism is a strong argument for Socialism.
Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 4 weeks ago
from_D4rkness@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
jimmy90@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
under socialism there was breadlines poverty endless war inequality injustice and a handful of corrupt party leaders that …
idiot
martti@suppo.fi 4 weeks ago
Soviet socialism ≠ socislism
lemonhead2@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
what is this image?
no matter how good the argument for socialism, you won’t get public support until the media supports it. media is owned by billionaires who are very veryuch pro capitalism
Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 4 weeks ago
It’s an elder meme at this point. It’s the second frame. The first one shows the unarmed astronaut looking at the earth and saying something like " it’s all just …"
uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
The media owns a lot of news media. Curiously, some platforms still allow independent media to leak though.
Hence, we know what the 2014 Ferguson Unrest looked like, or the 2020 George Floyd protests, or the current crisis in Gaza.
They’re trying to stop the signal, obfuscate it in disinformation and slop, but they haven’t stopped the whole signal yet.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
You sound new here.
LandBasedDaveyJones@lemmy.today 4 weeks ago
So, how does this apply bakc in time a bit, like in the 1940s? There were massive movements, like in Germany, and obviously Russia before, to kick it off. How did they accrue members and grow?
Small presses?? And just to clarify, not being snarky or anything, I just want to check what I know and what I assume, here.