See, I think there’s plenty to criticize in the game, but I’m always cautious anytime someone strings together adjectives “worst / terrible” without much description/quantitiy behind it. Not to accuse you directly, but it’s the pattern I see when the “anti-woke brigade” wants to attack a game.
I’d definitely say Sky’s main villain is mustache-twirlingly generic, but that’s part of why they have so many supporting villains, like Loewe. I also thought a lot better of the core character development of the heroes, and how a mustache-twirling generic villain compels the best out of them. But I’d say Zero’s villains were just as generic, and comparatively never got the feeling of hero development out of them. It also felt like a few arc patterns were just being reused from Sky.
So for any third parties reading, I guess you’d have to consider whether you care more about good heroes, or good villains.
I_Jedi@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Trails from Zero? Renne and the Sky protags showing up isn’t connected to the rest of the series?
Poopfeast420@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
That’s why I said almost. I remember being pretty disappointed at the end, because the ties to the rest of the series got more prominent.
Katana314@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I got a taste of that interconnection when I played Zero and really hated it. Renne’s one big scene felt like it was planned in Sky (or at latest Sky 3) and didn’t get in; it seemed to have nothing to do with the SSS, and I could see it was trying to start other new “character bricks” to throw later into Cold Steel. I never played those games, and generally think it’s a poor way to set them up.
It seems cool to pull Estelle and Joshua into later games for Avengers style teamups, but poor planning to make other games a part of someone’s (even a villain’s) arc.