chickenf622@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
This smells like an advertisement. Nobody’s even played the game how can we know it over delivers?
chickenf622@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
This smells like an advertisement. Nobody’s even played the game how can we know it over delivers?
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Really shows that people some read past the headline.
KssioAug@piefed.zip 1 week ago
I’ve read it (from here: https://archive.ph/ci9vj#selection-591.0-859.53 because I don’t want to give them the clicks). And? I agree with @chickenf622@sh.itjust.works , it smells like an advertisement. In fact, it doesn’t just smells, it practically screams like corporate propaganda.
chickenf622@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
If the headline looks like an ad I’m not going to waste time reading the article. As much as I too don’t like discussing an article without actually reading it I do have to decide if I want to spend my time reading it. Basically I think the title is bad and if that’s not what the article is saying they should change the title. Could’ve been something like “Take-Two CEO Admits GTA 6 Could Have Cost More Than $80, but Rockstar Chose Restraint and Hopes To Overdeliver On Value”. Make it seem like it isn’t set in stone that GTA 6 is more valuable than the price.
moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 4 days ago
The article has nothing in it. The company says, “We could have totally charged more, but we’re only charging you $80. And $100 for premium.”