Yes, but why would you put the burden of proof on the person accused of spreading medical misinformation, especially given the circumstances?
Wouldn’t it be far simpler and more direct to expect that if a person is accused of something like that and banned for it the one doing the accusing and banning be able to point to specifically what they had an issue with, so that everyone can easily verify that specific thing is medical misinformation if they’d like?
Crashumbc@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
That is the most bizarre personal attack on someone I’ve ever seen even including reddit… They wrote almost a page of information on their issue. And you the MOD of a community specifically set up to impartially address issues on .world. Decides to pull out a SINGLE sentence and use it to attack them?
Why? That’s just wow.
Just as a FYI people with mental health issues seeking help on a mental health community don’t bring their credentials expecting to “tested”. As a supposedly “impartial” mod you might want to keep that in mind.