Comment on Hmmm
SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 3 days agoYes, harm reduction is paramount. You must vote for and support the candidate who’ll kill only 700,000 people. It’s a moral imperative, because 700,000 is less than 5,000,000. Harm 👏 reduction 👏.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Unless, of course, they decide they need to kill 800k. Or 1M. Or 5M. Or 10M.
But hey, the other guys were going to kill more, we swear.
Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I think the other guys have proven how willing they are to kill people dorectly with policy changes and made up reasons to bomb brown school girls.
Its actually almost exactly as bad as kamalas campaign said it would be, but her campaign ran on very little past “plsplspls dont let them” without any substance.
Simply voting for harm reductions sake would have prevented quite a bit of what we’re seeing today
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Harris campaigned side by side with Liz Cheney, repeating all the same talking points that paved the way for our wars in Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, and Iraq.
I’ve seen absolutely nothing from the Biden interregnum that would lead me to believe a Harris government wouldn’t have slaughtered countless people for threadbare reasons.
And liberals would be defending it, while conservatives complained about incompetency.