If you want to nitpick you’d be better off replying directly to the comment I linked to.
Comment on Lemmy or Piefed?
1984@lemmy.today 1 day agoCaking code stupid is ableism? :)
All coders are ableism generators then.
mondoman712@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
rimu@piefed.social 1 day ago
I removed the word ‘stupid’ from the code 3 months ago, the function is now called ‘reply_is_low_effort’.
The haters don’t bother keeping their propaganda up to date.
1984@lemmy.today 1 day ago
I think you shouldn’t have removed it because saying something is stupid is not ableism.
Anyway, most people like piefed and I think its great with many alternatives. In a project like this you will get many opinions. Listen to the ones that make sense and ignore the ones that are stupid. Yes, I called something stupid. It’s not ableism for gods sake.
rimu@piefed.social 1 day ago
Abelism or not it took seconds to change so I don’t mind.
Attitude has turned out to be a lot less useful than I hoped…
1984@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Yeah. I think hacker news has some decent ideas about how to manage these things. You can ask chat gpt about some details to get the idea, but I think its something along the lines of users not being able to affect a discussion with voting until they have some sort of reputation. And I believe that reputation has to come from reactions by the community.
I think if you ask chat gpt about that and have a discussion, some good ideas could surface.