I mean strictly speaking, yes, it is odd to describe a dog directly with human socioeconomic descriptors.
But yeah, I meant it as ‘the dog is owned by a poor human’.
Comment on Pervert cancer
AscendantSquid@lemmy.world 21 hours agoIt’s not the point at all, but can dogs be poor? Like, their human can be poor, but does that then apply to the dog too? Applying a financial status to a dog feels weird, it’s not like it can open a bank account.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 hours ago
Tm12@lemmy.ca 20 hours ago
Maybe dogs can’t be wealthy, but some eat/live really well.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
a lot of people’s pets eat better than they do