You seem to be having trouble with the definition coercion… I’m not going to explain anything else to you or respond to any more bad faith questions.
Ask direct complete questions, provide a declarative statement of your own thesis, or kick rocks.
You seem to be having trouble with the definition coercion… I’m not going to explain anything else to you or respond to any more bad faith questions.
Ask direct complete questions, provide a declarative statement of your own thesis, or kick rocks.
tomalley8342@lemmy.world 1 day ago
In both cases, if the person needs what the other person is witholding, he is compelled to meet their demands, no?
“Even if your boss simply ignores you, the assumption is that there is a reason underneath, no?” and “And if you need what your boss has bad enough to change your behavior, you are coerced into it, no matter if the demand was properly communicated (proposition) or not (ignoring), no?” are complete questions, in fact, they are straight up yes or no questions, the simplest of them all.
TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
No, what you describe is not coercion. If you believe otherwise the burden of proof lies with you.
tomalley8342@lemmy.world 1 day ago
What do you mean burden of proof? It’s the dictionary definition. That I put literally right on top. To be compelled to act.
TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
So now you don’t know what the word “compel” means?
You’re wasting my fucking time kiddo.