Comment

Comment on Former Valve writer says PlayStation killing physical discs is no conspiracy: "You, the consumer, have made your choice, and the choice is for digital"

<- View Parent

tomalley8342@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

Sorry, it took me for a surprise because I don’t believe I have expressed any preference for a type of video game here. No, I am not insinuating that developers won’t be able to make money if they don’t “comply” with some draconian corporate strategy they loath. Like I said earlier, it’s a hypothetical scenario.

source

Sort:hotnew top

TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
Great, some agree that platform holders and AAA devs going digital only won’t hinder the industry!

source
- tomalley8342@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Then, going back to the original post, you would be okay with saying that there isn’t really a “necessity” in the “course correction”, and that if the 3,700,000,000 gamers wanted otherwise, they probably would get it, right?
  
  source
  - TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I think the system that capitalists developed in the 19th and 20th century devalues art and exploits creatives. I think at the time, their work wasn’t seen by the masses as “real labor”, or being of intrinsic value to humanity due to the general population being mostly preoccupied with figuring out how to meet their basic survival needs in an newly industrialized world.
    
    If an actual majority of the 3,700,000,000 gamers believe that physical media must exist or they will boycott the entire industry (as unlikely I think that it), then yes, they will likely get what they want as artists will feel pressured to kowtow or risk their livelihood. If this were to come to pass, I would see it as a moral failing of society to choose ongoing victimization of create workers for their own convenience.
    
    To be clear if the gaming industry was currently attempting to eliminate digital sales and move explicitly to physical media, I would feel the exact same way about public pressure to keep digital.
    
    My objection is not about one set of practices over the other, it is about the artists fundamental moral authority to choose how their intellectual labor is capitalized without direct interference from outside influences against their will.
    
    source
    tomalley8342@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    
    I would see it as a moral failing of society to choose ongoing victimization of create workers for their own convenience.
    
    Why? It’s not a failure for a consumer to want what they want. You even said yourself earlier:
    
    If a thing stops being something I want to engage with, I stop engaging.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments