Comment on Where has the "www." gone?
TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
because it used to be necessarily, and it ICANN reformed stuff year ago, so now it’s not.
Comment on Where has the "www." gone?
TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
because it used to be necessarily, and it ICANN reformed stuff year ago, so now it’s not.
stoy@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
IT guy here, I can’t believe it was ever technically necessary, though I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a best practice published by ICANN.
AskewLord@piefed.social 8 hours ago
browsers didn’t auto-complete it like they do now, so it was necessary for users to type it.
Dultas@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
It was only necessary if the site was configured that way which most typically were. This was to differentiate which server would handle the request, web, file, mail, etc. I’m pretty sure there was no RFC that stated it was a requirement. Even on the early web it wasn’t uncommon to see a www2 or some other numbered prefix for different versions of a site. The reason you see it less now is because like you said browsers will add it, but also because most sites no longer use it as web is typically the assumed default.
Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 hours ago
I think before all browsers ended up filling it in, it was standard practice to set up the server to intercept anything missing that part before the domain name and stick a "www" in front so it wouldn't just dead end. Basically a redirect.