Comment on Interesting

• Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Almost like its an impossible to achieve strictly idealistic pursuit.

  source

  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Which is it? There can’t be a “classic line” for historically implemented large scale communism if large scale communism is impossible to implement. You’re contradicting yourself.

    source

    • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Every time something is labeled communism it’s communism until atrocities happen. Then it wasn’t really implemented. Both of my statements are true. Pigs can fly if you throw them off a cliff but pigs never had wings so they could never fly. Both statements are true.

      source

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Nah, that’s nonsense word salad. Either large scale communism is impossible and thus has never been implemented, in which case the “classic line” is 100% true, or it is possible in which your claim that it’s impossible is wrong.

        Either way you seem to have a pretty weak grasp of history and logic, so good luck out there 👍

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• timestatic@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The stateless version is an ideal that will never be reached with so many people around lmao

  source

  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Unironically depends on how you define “state”.

    source
• OS2Warp@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Image

  source
• csolisr@hub.azkware.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The alternative is, of course, everyone becoming self-reliant hermits and very good luck with that

  source