You do realize that they made nuclear recycling illegal in the USA right?
Which is ironic because nuclear waste is 97% pure fuel and the remaining 3% has other uses in medicine or have half-lives measured in minutes/hours or are stable (like gold)
Comment on Not a single one
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 6 days agoEfficient use of resources still matters in a service-driven model.
The service in this case is to provide electricity - if other alternatives can provide the same system of electricity while using less resources in the process, then it is clearly preferable.
bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 6 days ago
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 6 days ago
I don’t know what this has to do with my post at all to be honest
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 6 days ago
It’s relevant because the less-resource-efficient oil industry has lobbied to make nuclear power artificially inefficient so that their industry can continue to exist.
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 6 days ago
I don’t think anyone is arguing for the oil industry.
Even if nuclear power plant byproducts were re-used at 100%, this would still decidedly not make nuclear energy more resource efficient than solar and wind.
overcast5348@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Externalized costs are a thing though. For instance, a coal plant spewing smoke (and radiation) costs everyone else money. A nuclear plant OTOH is usually responsible for dealing with all of its own shit. So it’s not always an apples to apples comparison to consider just the profitability of a project.
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 6 days ago
Absolutely. I don’t know that anyone is arguing for coal, except for Trump, but he’s also completely deranged.
Wind and solar have very little externalities, however. I’d even call their externalities trivial.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 6 days ago
Water vapor from the cooling tower is also a greenhouse gas but all heat exchange power plants at such scale emit it. Plus the nuclear waste, not yet economical to recycle, sometimes becomes its own problem too. So the overall externalities of a nuclear power plant are small (it’s the least deadly one!) but not zero.
waldfee@feddit.org 6 days ago
It sure isn’t apples to apples, but it’s also not like nuclear plants actually dealt with their waste
Philote@lemmy.ml 6 days ago
Are you talking about current nuclear plants or the first generation ones built in the 50’s. Because that’s like using steam train safety to negate the use of modern trains.
waldfee@feddit.org 6 days ago
Oh, I must’ve missed the point where nuclear plants started turning their fuel into mere satisfaction. Good thing the waste from the 50s is still around, I’m sure they can take care of it!